Incoterms: recording transfer of risk in transport

Incoterms® allocate costs, tasks and risks between seller and buyer at a defined point in a sale of goods. In transport, it is not enough to put “CIP” or “DAP” on an order. The named place, the version used and the actual handover point determine whether the transfer of risk can later be traced.

After cargo damage, businesses must separate two levels: the transfer of risk between seller and buyer under the sales contract and the carrier’s liability under the contract of carriage. An Incoterms rule does not automatically determine whether the carrier is liable for loss or damage.

This article explains how to document transfer of risk and assess cargo damage. Incoterms® 2020 are standardised contractual rules of the International Chamber of Commerce. They do not replace an individual contract review or the applicable Austrian and international freight-law rules.

The ICC presents Incoterms® 2020 as rules for international trade in goods with eleven trade terms. They allocate costs, risks and responsibilities between seller and buyer. The rules do not become part of a contract merely because an abbreviation appears on an invoice or delivery note. The parties should agree the rule in the sales contract or in an order confirmation that clearly incorporates it.

The designation should include the particular rule, such as FCA, CIP or DAP, the named place and the version. A clear wording could be: “CIP [specific destination], Incoterms® 2020”. A city alone may be insufficient if several handover points and different operating procedures are possible within that city.

An Incoterms rule generally does not regulate title, retention of title, payment due dates, conformity of the goods or the consequences of breach. Those matters must be agreed separately. The rule also does not automatically select the governing law or the competent court.

The transfer of risk under the sales contract concerns the relationship between seller and buyer. If risk transfers on delivery to the first carrier, the buyer may bear the economic risk even though the goods have not reached the destination. This does not by itself establish a breach by the carrier.

The contract of carriage has its own parties and legal rules. For international carriage of goods by road, the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) may apply. The consignment note, consignment particulars, delivery and liability must then be examined under that framework.

The Austrian contract of carriage and the carrier’s duties under the Austrian Commercial Code are likewise not replaced by an Incoterms rule. After damage, the relevant questions are therefore not limited to who bears risk under CIP or FCA. They also include when the damage occurred, who had custody of the goods and whether a reservation was recorded.

The focus page on the CMR and transport contract explains the carriage side. For cargo damage, the CMR liability check provides an initial orientation.

EXW: The goods are generally placed at the buyer’s disposal at the named place. Who actually loads the goods and how export formalities are handled should not be assumed. The parties should check whether EXW reflects the real international supply-chain process.

FCA: The seller delivers at the named place. If the place is the seller’s premises, delivery generally occurs after loading onto the vehicle arranged by the buyer. If it is elsewhere, the goods are placed at the disposal of the carrier nominated by the buyer. The place must therefore be precise.

CPT and CIP: The seller pays carriage to the named destination, but risk generally transfers earlier when the goods are handed to the carrier. CIP adds an insurance obligation for the seller. That insurance does not automatically move the transfer of risk to the destination.

DAP, DPU and DDP: Under these rules, risk generally transfers at the named destination. Whether the goods are still on the arriving vehicle or have already been unloaded distinguishes the rules. DPU requires unloading by the seller; the actual handover point should be recorded.

These examples do not replace review of the complete ICC rule and the contract. The decisive factors are the rule, place, version, actual process and any special agreement.

After visible or suspected damage, close the evidence chain immediately. Photograph the packaging, goods, loading unit, securing arrangements, labels and condition at delivery. Record date, time, place, persons present and the damage observed. A reservation in the consignment note should be specific enough to link the statement to the goods and damage.

Keep the sales contract with its Incoterms rule, order confirmation, shipping confirmation, consignment note, handover and delivery records, photographs, weighing or temperature records, and communications with seller, buyer, forwarder and carrier. An invoice or delivery note may support the handover but does not necessarily prove the condition at the relevant point.

Assign every document to one consignment reference. Record whether the rule describes carriage to a destination or identifies the place of risk transfer. Then establish whether the goods were handed to the carrier, accepted, transhipped or delivered. These facts may be more important for liability than the abbreviation alone.

The cargo damage documentation checklist supports the first steps. If documents are missing or inconsistent, see also the page on consignment notes and documentation.

An Incoterms rule may require transport insurance. That obligation is separate from the carrier’s statutory or contractual liability. Insurance protects the economic position, while liability asks whether a particular person or business must compensate the loss.

Check the insured person, insured leg, exclusions, deductibles, goods value, notice requirements and documents needed under the policy. Under CIP, the seller’s insurance obligation is part of the rule; the scope and terms must still be checked against the policy.

Do not leave the question of who reports the damage and which documents are needed until a contractual or statutory deadline is close. A claim under an insurance policy is not automatically an admission of liability. Conversely, a late or incomplete notice can make recovery more difficult.

Stating only the abbreviation: Without a named place and version, the intended handover point may remain unclear.

Equating carriage costs with risk: The party paying the main carriage does not automatically bear risk until destination.

Confusing Incoterms with the CMR: The sales rule does not replace the contract of carriage or consignment note.

Treating containers like conventional sea cargo: Whether a rule matches the actual handover and terminal process must be checked before agreement.

Treating insurance as proof of liability: An insurance obligation does not answer the carrier-liability question.

Documenting damage only at destination: Without evidence of condition and handover, the time of damage may be difficult to establish.

Agree the complete rule with the specific place and the wording “Incoterms® 2020”. Also describe which handover point within the site is meant, who loads or unloads and which records evidence the transfer. Regulate title, payment, insurance, jurisdiction and governing law separately.

Align the sales contract, transport order, CMR consignment note, delivery note and insurance evidence. One consignment reference makes the records easier to match. For recurring shipments, a standard process should identify who checks the rule, appoints the carrier and responds to a reservation.

After damage, preserve the records before making a statement about responsibility. Have the sales contract, carriage contract, insurance and evidence reviewed together where necessary. This prevents an incorrect Incoterms assumption from obscuring the actual claim.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.